DEMOKRASI DELIBERATIF HABERMAS DAN PROBLEMATIKA IDEOLOGI DI RUANG PUBLIK DIGITAL

Authors

  • Silfanus Jemadin institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero
  • Ando Tahamin Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero, Maumere, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63037/ivl.v9i1.183

Keywords:

Demokrasi Deliberatif, Ideologi, Ruang Publik, Media Sosial.

Abstract

The development of digital technology has significantly transformed public spaces and contemporary democratic practices. Social media and digital platforms provide new spaces for broader political participation, but at the same time pose serious challenges to deliberative democracy. This article aims to analyze the problems of ideology in digital public spaces and their implications for the quality of democratic deliberation. This researchuses a qualitative approach with a literature study method and critical discourse analysis of relevant academic literature. The results of the study show that ideological polarization, the echo chamber phenomenon, the emotionalization of political discourse, the spread of disinformation, and digital power imbalances have weakened the communicative rationality that is the foundation of deliberative democracy. The findings of this article emphasize the importance of strengthening digital literacy, public discourse ethics, and digital platform governance as efforts to maintain the quality of deliberative democracy in the digital era.

References

Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211

Amri, Y., & Yandri, L. I. (2025). Algoritma media sosial dan polarisasi: penguatan echo chamber dan dampaknya terhadap kualitas deliberasi publik. Jurnal Sosial Dan Politik, 2(1), 1–12.

Armanda, D. M., Afaf, D., & Krisdahyanto, R. (2025). Filter bubble dan echo chamber: Pengaruh algoritma media sosial terhadap pola konsumsi informasi mahasiswa Universitas Lampung. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Sosial Politik, 2(4), 1124–1129. https://doi.org/10.62379/jiksp.v2i4.266

Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(9), e2023301118.

Cuchumbé Holguín, N. J. (2010). Deliberative democracy: public opinion and political will. Estudios de Filosofía, 42, 87–101.

Dahlberg, L. (2001). Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180110097025

Edfa, N. L. (2025). Fenomena echo chamber di era digital. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691175515

Efriani, Y. (2025). Polarisasi politik Indonesia tahun 2024 dalam pemberitaan media online. Jurnal Harmoni, 3(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.59581/harmoni-widyakarya.v3i1.4869

Fadli, M. R. (2019). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075

Fatimah, S. (2025). Transformasi ruang publik digital: Tantangan sosial dan konstitusional dalam demokrasi era media baru. Jurnal Cakrawala, 19(1), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.32781/cakrawala.v19i1.785

Gastil, J., & Black, L. (2007). Public deliberation as the organizing principle of political communication research. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.59

Gimmler, A. (2001). Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the Internet. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 27(4), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145370102700402

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contribution to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.

Haliim, W. (2018). Demokrasi deliberatif Indonesia: Konsep partisipasi masyarakat dalam membentuk demokrasi dan hukum yang responsif. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 42(1).

Hardiman, B. F. (2009). Demokrasi deliberatif: Menimbang negara hukum dan ruang publik dalam teori diskursus Jürgen Habermas. Kanisius.

Juniasari, A., Suryasuci Ramdhan, A., Putri, A., Yohana, E., & Wiguna, E. (2025). Propaganda dan ideologi dalam iklan politik di media sosial. Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial Politik, 3(3), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v3i3.5152

Kadarsih, R. (2008). Demokrasi dalam ruang publik: Sebuah pemikiran ulang untuk media massa di Indonesia. Jurnal Dakwah, 9(1).

Lewar, P. P., & Madung, O. G. N. (2022). [Judul artikel]. Jurnal Ledalero. https://ejurnal.iftkledalero.ac.id/index.php/JLe/article/view/315

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427.

Muthhar, A. M. (2016). Membaca demokrasi deliberatif Jürgen Habermas dalam dinamika politik Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 2(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.15408/ushuluna.v2i2.15180

Muttaqien, M. E., Deden, & Ramdam. (2023). Konsep komunikasi Jürgen Habermas dalam ide demokrasi deliberatif dan tindakan komunikatif. Jurnal Unpas, 6(1), 55.

Nino, M. (2024). Demokrasi deliberatif Jürgen Habermas dan relevansinya bagi demokrasi Pancasila. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Institut Filsafat Dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero, 23(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.31385/jakad.v23i2.27

Prasetyo, A. G. (2012). Menuju demokrasi rasional: Melacak pemikiran Jürgen Habermas tentang ruang publik. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 16(2), 170–171. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10901

Sastepratedja, S. (2010). Ruang publik dan ruang privat dalam tinjauan kebudayaan BT - Ruang publik: Melacak “Partisipasi demokrasi” dari polis sampai cyberspace. Kanisius.

Team, E. (2025). Era baru demokrasi: Bagaimana teknologi mengubah partisipasi politik global transformasi demokrasi digital. https://www.at-grc.com/post/era-baru-demokrasi-bagaimana-teknologi-mengubah-partisipasi-politik-globaltransformasi-demokrasi

Wahyudi, R. F., Musliadi, M., & Faridah. (2023). Ruang publik, media sosial, demokrasi, dan pendekatan kritis. RETORIKA: Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.47435/retorika.v6i2.3140

Published

2026-03-09

How to Cite

Jemadin, S., & Tahamin, A. (2026). DEMOKRASI DELIBERATIF HABERMAS DAN PROBLEMATIKA IDEOLOGI DI RUANG PUBLIK DIGITAL. In Veritate Lux : Jurnal Ilmu Kateketik Pastoral Teologi, Pendidikan, Antropologi, Dan Budaya, 9(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.63037/ivl.v9i1.183